ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
There's a lot of people saying "The Husbands Of River Song" is the least Christmassy of the Doctor Who, though I must admit I'm not quite sure why they say that. There's snow, the story ends on Christmas, and the Doctor opens the episode with antlers. For me, the signs were writ large that this was The Christmas Special, and truthfully I've never really had a problem with this. After all, that's what it is. Why bother to fight it?
So aside from the traditional moans about Christmas specials, this also saw Alex Kingston returning as River Song (and getting her name in the title credits for the first time ever!), which brings forth another round of whinging from a section of Who fans who hate the character, or who hate the idea of the Doctor being in love with her. Steven Moffat, of course, subverts all of that, and as usual it's difficult to know whether he's hitting back against his haters, or if this was always part of the long term plan. After all this time, I tend to think it's the latter. The Doctor is River's sunset, we discover, and she doesn't expect it to love her back. Why would she? But Capaldi plays his part perfectly through all of this, giving us the hint that the Doctor does have some sort of feeling for River, and whilst he doesn't love her the way she loves him, he does try on occasion. The final scenes of this episode are Moffat writing at his very best, balancing the emotion with the drama and delivering both. Though the Doctor's callous attitude towards the dead in the crash seems a trifle harsh. I know they were all murderers, but still...
Alex Kingston was a great double act with David Tennant, but her rapport with Matt Smith was out of this world. Everything about them played so well together, that, in truth, we sort of forgot that River Song ever met the tenth Doctor. Placing her opposite the older, more acerbic twelfth Doctor was going to be interesting, but a bit of a gamble - after all, they couldn't possibly have the same chemistry Kingston had with Smith. And, truth to tell, she doesn't. But that doesn't mean the pair aren't brilliant together. By twisting the story around so that this time the Doctor's the one with all the foreknowledge, and a face that River has never met, nor believes can possibly exist, we get to see how River acts without the Doctor around. And so does he, which gives Capaldi some great opportunities to deliver some humour. The script is, of course, lighter than the season(s) that have preceded it, and we see Capaldi almost getting a Tennant script, and showing just how good he is at comedy. It's a bit like the Hartnell years all over again - those rare scripts that showed us just how good Hartnell was at comedy now mirror Capaldi's run.
Of course, there are two other comedians in this episode. Matt Lucas plays the very straight role of Nardole, which requires him to be scared and obsequieous most of the time, and he does this particularly well, but as a consequence remains somewhat inconsequential as a result. Greg Davies, on the other hand, one of my all time favourite comedians, gets a role he can have loads of fun with. Sadly he doesn't get nearly enough screen time, and I wanted to see more of King Hydroflax and Davies delivering a performance Rik Mayall would have been proud of. Phillip Rhys and Rowan Polonski perform the other major roles (oh dear...look who's failed the Bechdel test again), but both of them are swept away by the higher four cast members. It's a tough gig on Doctor Who, and with Capaldi and Kingston on fine form, you don't want to be billed lower than fourth.
And so, it's Doctor Who as usual, with a fun, rollercoaster adventure, and a rather nice payoff if you care about River Song. Being a romp, you don't have to pay a great deal of attention to what's going on, but the plot is still fun, and Moffat delivers a couple of old favourite moments (everyone in the room turning to the Doctor, for instance, and a half face man), but each with a subtle twist (the man pulling his head open to retrieve the payment was genuinely gruesome), and, as mentioned, there was a great deal of comedy to play. Plus, the episode was in the skilful hands of Douglas Mackinnon, a directing veteran who skipped the last season, but made a welcome return for the special. Mackinnon is excellent at his job, and brings his episodes to life beautifully. Of particular note are the scenes at the end, which are framed and lit perfectly (so special mention to DOP Suzie Lavelle as well!).
Next year will be an interesting year for Doctor Who. If I were a betting man, I'd say it's unlikely we'll get a regular season next year, but hopefully we'll get at least a special before the traditional Christmas feast. Should we be sad? No...2017 will definitely see series ten, so truth be told, perhaps next year will be lean enough to make us remember we shouldn't take the tradition of Doctor Who, let alone its Christmas special, for granted.
So aside from the traditional moans about Christmas specials, this also saw Alex Kingston returning as River Song (and getting her name in the title credits for the first time ever!), which brings forth another round of whinging from a section of Who fans who hate the character, or who hate the idea of the Doctor being in love with her. Steven Moffat, of course, subverts all of that, and as usual it's difficult to know whether he's hitting back against his haters, or if this was always part of the long term plan. After all this time, I tend to think it's the latter. The Doctor is River's sunset, we discover, and she doesn't expect it to love her back. Why would she? But Capaldi plays his part perfectly through all of this, giving us the hint that the Doctor does have some sort of feeling for River, and whilst he doesn't love her the way she loves him, he does try on occasion. The final scenes of this episode are Moffat writing at his very best, balancing the emotion with the drama and delivering both. Though the Doctor's callous attitude towards the dead in the crash seems a trifle harsh. I know they were all murderers, but still...
Alex Kingston was a great double act with David Tennant, but her rapport with Matt Smith was out of this world. Everything about them played so well together, that, in truth, we sort of forgot that River Song ever met the tenth Doctor. Placing her opposite the older, more acerbic twelfth Doctor was going to be interesting, but a bit of a gamble - after all, they couldn't possibly have the same chemistry Kingston had with Smith. And, truth to tell, she doesn't. But that doesn't mean the pair aren't brilliant together. By twisting the story around so that this time the Doctor's the one with all the foreknowledge, and a face that River has never met, nor believes can possibly exist, we get to see how River acts without the Doctor around. And so does he, which gives Capaldi some great opportunities to deliver some humour. The script is, of course, lighter than the season(s) that have preceded it, and we see Capaldi almost getting a Tennant script, and showing just how good he is at comedy. It's a bit like the Hartnell years all over again - those rare scripts that showed us just how good Hartnell was at comedy now mirror Capaldi's run.
Of course, there are two other comedians in this episode. Matt Lucas plays the very straight role of Nardole, which requires him to be scared and obsequieous most of the time, and he does this particularly well, but as a consequence remains somewhat inconsequential as a result. Greg Davies, on the other hand, one of my all time favourite comedians, gets a role he can have loads of fun with. Sadly he doesn't get nearly enough screen time, and I wanted to see more of King Hydroflax and Davies delivering a performance Rik Mayall would have been proud of. Phillip Rhys and Rowan Polonski perform the other major roles (oh dear...look who's failed the Bechdel test again), but both of them are swept away by the higher four cast members. It's a tough gig on Doctor Who, and with Capaldi and Kingston on fine form, you don't want to be billed lower than fourth.
And so, it's Doctor Who as usual, with a fun, rollercoaster adventure, and a rather nice payoff if you care about River Song. Being a romp, you don't have to pay a great deal of attention to what's going on, but the plot is still fun, and Moffat delivers a couple of old favourite moments (everyone in the room turning to the Doctor, for instance, and a half face man), but each with a subtle twist (the man pulling his head open to retrieve the payment was genuinely gruesome), and, as mentioned, there was a great deal of comedy to play. Plus, the episode was in the skilful hands of Douglas Mackinnon, a directing veteran who skipped the last season, but made a welcome return for the special. Mackinnon is excellent at his job, and brings his episodes to life beautifully. Of particular note are the scenes at the end, which are framed and lit perfectly (so special mention to DOP Suzie Lavelle as well!).
Next year will be an interesting year for Doctor Who. If I were a betting man, I'd say it's unlikely we'll get a regular season next year, but hopefully we'll get at least a special before the traditional Christmas feast. Should we be sad? No...2017 will definitely see series ten, so truth be told, perhaps next year will be lean enough to make us remember we shouldn't take the tradition of Doctor Who, let alone its Christmas special, for granted.
Reflection: Doctor Who - The Timeless Children
Well I suppose that's Lungbarrow out of continuity... The Timeless Children closes off a season that is without doubt a step up from the previous one, giving us episodes that are of a much higher quality in terms of writing than what we had before, a more confident performance from Jodie Whittaker (though it would appear at the cost of her companions' performances) and Chibnall learning to give 'em the old razzle-dazzle. After watching the episode I kinda thought I liked it. Lots of surprises, shock revelations that would "change everything" and my favourite monsters - the Cybermen. Working with the Master again. Wait-a-minute. Gosh, there's so much I want to say, and in truth most of it is a criticism, which is going to sound very negative, but it's hard to grab hold of the positives. Sorry Chibnall, I'm not sure your end-of-series finale quite pulled it off. I love the Cybermen. They should be brilliant. They were astonishingly scary in the black-and-white days, lumbering around
Reflection: Doctor Who - Ascension of the Cybermen
The Cybermen are an odd Doctor Who monster. As a concept they are wonderfully creepy, but all too often they are used as a standard "monster of the week". In those situations, there's a real problem with how to deal with them, and so as a result they have convenient weaknesses that can be exploited to deal with them. Arguably they aren't the most effective monsters, but when used well, they are definitely the most creepiest. The Lone Cyberman is a great use of the Cybermen, let's be clear. The partially converted head beneath the helmet is disturbing and gives us a better idea of what the Cybermen are supposed to represent. This one, though, is odder than most - an arm from the originals, a body from the most recent, a head from Davies era; he's less a partially converted Cyberman, and more a Frankenstein's monster of Cybermen - pun, presumably, intended. But he works. He has an anger that plays against his emotionless offspring. He's scary because he's a stepping stone, and that
Reaction: Doctor Who #12.8
One of the biggest problems about Doctor Who is that fans - actually not even fans, anyone really - all have their own on idea on what Doctor Who is, and what makes it good. It's part of the reason why Doctor Who feels so different everytime a new producer takes over, and a big part of the reason Doctor Who fans argue over whether the current series is "proper" Doctor Who or not. I won't lie, I've long learned that Doctor Who is anything and changes frequently, but I obviously have a preference and that is scary. Doctor Who needs to be scary. Action/adventure is the secondary genre for me. As such "The Haunting Of Villa Diodati" was always going to have a leg up in terms of brilliance for me. Ghost house...you can't go wrong really. Meeting Byron and Mary Shelley has been a surprisingly long time coming (or not if you like the Big Finish Doctor Who audio stories, and if you do, you probably spent a lot of time fretting over the fact this episode over-writes those). With the Doctor
Reflection: Doctor Who - Can You Hear Me?
There's a new villain in town. He's got a bald head and tattoos and in love with a woman trapped between two worlds feeding off nightmares. He's also playing games with human beings... Is he the Nightmare Man, stepped out of The Sarah Jane Adventures to tussle with the Doctor? Is he the Toymaker, the Doctor's deadly foe resurrected for the new millenium? Or is it the Black Guardian...one of the immortal figures that balance chaos and good in the universe? No. It's not the last two, even though both are mentioned and it's not the first, but just happens to be quite similar. Although I quite like it when the new series references the past, I do feel that name dropping is sometimes a double-edged sword. If you're going to introduce a character very similar to the Toymaker, and then have him say "The Toymaker would be proud", you should possibly be asking yourself either a) why didn't I just make it the Toymaker in the first place, or b) why did I waste time referencing a character so
© 2015 - 2024 DoctorRy
Comments0
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In