ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
Truth to tell, I'm not really certain how I feel about "In The Forest Of The Night". The best thing I can say is that I have very positive feelings about it, because there was an awful lot to like in the episode. I'm just not sure I liked the episode.
Firstly, an episode with a bunch of kids is always tough, though Doctor Who has always had a pretty good run with child actors, and this episode featured a fairly good group, with three stand outs - Abigail Eames as Maebh, Ashley Foster as Bradley and Harley Bird as Ruby. Bird, of course, is the voice of Peppa Pig, one of my favourite litttle kid shows (seriously, if you've never seen it, you should - it's surprisingly hilarious), but she is a great little actress and made Ruby very likable. Foster's character, sadly, doesn't quite get as good as you suspect he should, despite a nice build up. Eames spends most of her time with Capaldi, and there's a nice contrast between her and the twelfth Doctor, who is somewhat tolerant of Maebh - interesting given how wonderful Matt Smith's eleventh Doctor was with little kids. Clara and Danny continue their relationship; Clara swinging back and forth in this episode between wanting Danny's loving life and her addiction to the adventures she has with the Doctor. Like a true addict, it's hard to imagine her not choosing her addiction over her family. Though the next time trailer suggests something maybe a little more odd...
I wanted to check something on this episode, and as I sat down to do so (the title theme is out of synch with the sequence), I ended up watching the entire episode again. A second viewing has changed my mind, and made me decide that I quite like the episode. It's not a simple plot and a second viewing makes things a lot clearer. The existence of a an ancient species on Earth that (is?) can control the trees is probably the biggest hurdle that the script requires of us, although there is still the question of how Maebh knows all that she knows. How can she pick up the thoughts of Clara and know that a solar flare is coming? Is that because of the creatures, or is that natural to her? These aren't really perplexing questions, but it would be nice to know the reason behind them.
The most annoying part of the episode, however, is Maebh's older sister. It's completely unclear why she disappeared, why she turned up again in the bushes and what the point of that part of the story was anyway. Seeing at it was mostly redundant, I can let it pass, but regardless it's a slightly annoying end to an otherwise enjoyable episode.
The plot holes mean that this episode will never be a five star event, but for the most part the sum of the parts are entertaining enough to overlook the disappointing whole. New director Sheree Folkson (a woman!) does a pretty good job for a director who has little effects experience. She frames the episode very well, though I can only imagine it must have been quite a learning experience given the sheer volume of CG that has gone into this. Perhaps that's the reason this episode was the final one in the series filmed. Regardless, Folkson should definitely return, and another script from Frank Cottrell-Boyce would be appreciated as well (though if Moffat and his script editors relaxed on the criticism because of Cottrell-Boyce's pedigree, they really can skip that next time round).
I don't think this is the weakest story of the series, but unfortunately, coming after what was probably the best, and heralding a particularly exciting-looking story to come, "In The Forest Of The Night" feels a little like a disappointing middle child. Definitely worth a watch, though.
If you're interested in my review for "Flatline", it's here: enterpriseofgeeks.blogspot.com…
Firstly, an episode with a bunch of kids is always tough, though Doctor Who has always had a pretty good run with child actors, and this episode featured a fairly good group, with three stand outs - Abigail Eames as Maebh, Ashley Foster as Bradley and Harley Bird as Ruby. Bird, of course, is the voice of Peppa Pig, one of my favourite litttle kid shows (seriously, if you've never seen it, you should - it's surprisingly hilarious), but she is a great little actress and made Ruby very likable. Foster's character, sadly, doesn't quite get as good as you suspect he should, despite a nice build up. Eames spends most of her time with Capaldi, and there's a nice contrast between her and the twelfth Doctor, who is somewhat tolerant of Maebh - interesting given how wonderful Matt Smith's eleventh Doctor was with little kids. Clara and Danny continue their relationship; Clara swinging back and forth in this episode between wanting Danny's loving life and her addiction to the adventures she has with the Doctor. Like a true addict, it's hard to imagine her not choosing her addiction over her family. Though the next time trailer suggests something maybe a little more odd...
I wanted to check something on this episode, and as I sat down to do so (the title theme is out of synch with the sequence), I ended up watching the entire episode again. A second viewing has changed my mind, and made me decide that I quite like the episode. It's not a simple plot and a second viewing makes things a lot clearer. The existence of a an ancient species on Earth that (is?) can control the trees is probably the biggest hurdle that the script requires of us, although there is still the question of how Maebh knows all that she knows. How can she pick up the thoughts of Clara and know that a solar flare is coming? Is that because of the creatures, or is that natural to her? These aren't really perplexing questions, but it would be nice to know the reason behind them.
The most annoying part of the episode, however, is Maebh's older sister. It's completely unclear why she disappeared, why she turned up again in the bushes and what the point of that part of the story was anyway. Seeing at it was mostly redundant, I can let it pass, but regardless it's a slightly annoying end to an otherwise enjoyable episode.
The plot holes mean that this episode will never be a five star event, but for the most part the sum of the parts are entertaining enough to overlook the disappointing whole. New director Sheree Folkson (a woman!) does a pretty good job for a director who has little effects experience. She frames the episode very well, though I can only imagine it must have been quite a learning experience given the sheer volume of CG that has gone into this. Perhaps that's the reason this episode was the final one in the series filmed. Regardless, Folkson should definitely return, and another script from Frank Cottrell-Boyce would be appreciated as well (though if Moffat and his script editors relaxed on the criticism because of Cottrell-Boyce's pedigree, they really can skip that next time round).
I don't think this is the weakest story of the series, but unfortunately, coming after what was probably the best, and heralding a particularly exciting-looking story to come, "In The Forest Of The Night" feels a little like a disappointing middle child. Definitely worth a watch, though.
If you're interested in my review for "Flatline", it's here: enterpriseofgeeks.blogspot.com…
Reflection: Doctor Who - The Timeless Children
Well I suppose that's Lungbarrow out of continuity... The Timeless Children closes off a season that is without doubt a step up from the previous one, giving us episodes that are of a much higher quality in terms of writing than what we had before, a more confident performance from Jodie Whittaker (though it would appear at the cost of her companions' performances) and Chibnall learning to give 'em the old razzle-dazzle. After watching the episode I kinda thought I liked it. Lots of surprises, shock revelations that would "change everything" and my favourite monsters - the Cybermen. Working with the Master again. Wait-a-minute. Gosh, there's so much I want to say, and in truth most of it is a criticism, which is going to sound very negative, but it's hard to grab hold of the positives. Sorry Chibnall, I'm not sure your end-of-series finale quite pulled it off. I love the Cybermen. They should be brilliant. They were astonishingly scary in the black-and-white days, lumbering around
Reflection: Doctor Who - Ascension of the Cybermen
The Cybermen are an odd Doctor Who monster. As a concept they are wonderfully creepy, but all too often they are used as a standard "monster of the week". In those situations, there's a real problem with how to deal with them, and so as a result they have convenient weaknesses that can be exploited to deal with them. Arguably they aren't the most effective monsters, but when used well, they are definitely the most creepiest. The Lone Cyberman is a great use of the Cybermen, let's be clear. The partially converted head beneath the helmet is disturbing and gives us a better idea of what the Cybermen are supposed to represent. This one, though, is odder than most - an arm from the originals, a body from the most recent, a head from Davies era; he's less a partially converted Cyberman, and more a Frankenstein's monster of Cybermen - pun, presumably, intended. But he works. He has an anger that plays against his emotionless offspring. He's scary because he's a stepping stone, and that
Reaction: Doctor Who #12.8
One of the biggest problems about Doctor Who is that fans - actually not even fans, anyone really - all have their own on idea on what Doctor Who is, and what makes it good. It's part of the reason why Doctor Who feels so different everytime a new producer takes over, and a big part of the reason Doctor Who fans argue over whether the current series is "proper" Doctor Who or not. I won't lie, I've long learned that Doctor Who is anything and changes frequently, but I obviously have a preference and that is scary. Doctor Who needs to be scary. Action/adventure is the secondary genre for me. As such "The Haunting Of Villa Diodati" was always going to have a leg up in terms of brilliance for me. Ghost house...you can't go wrong really. Meeting Byron and Mary Shelley has been a surprisingly long time coming (or not if you like the Big Finish Doctor Who audio stories, and if you do, you probably spent a lot of time fretting over the fact this episode over-writes those). With the Doctor
Reflection: Doctor Who - Can You Hear Me?
There's a new villain in town. He's got a bald head and tattoos and in love with a woman trapped between two worlds feeding off nightmares. He's also playing games with human beings... Is he the Nightmare Man, stepped out of The Sarah Jane Adventures to tussle with the Doctor? Is he the Toymaker, the Doctor's deadly foe resurrected for the new millenium? Or is it the Black Guardian...one of the immortal figures that balance chaos and good in the universe? No. It's not the last two, even though both are mentioned and it's not the first, but just happens to be quite similar. Although I quite like it when the new series references the past, I do feel that name dropping is sometimes a double-edged sword. If you're going to introduce a character very similar to the Toymaker, and then have him say "The Toymaker would be proud", you should possibly be asking yourself either a) why didn't I just make it the Toymaker in the first place, or b) why did I waste time referencing a character so
© 2014 - 2024 DoctorRy
Comments0
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In